On 2017-11-10 22:46, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 11/10/2017 02:31 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
>> We currently do not guard everywhere against a NULL bs->drv where we
>> should be doing so. Most of the places fixed here just do not care
>> about that case at all.
>>
>> Some care implicitly, e.g. through a prio
On 11/10/2017 02:31 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
> We currently do not guard everywhere against a NULL bs->drv where we
> should be doing so. Most of the places fixed here just do not care
> about that case at all.
>
> Some care implicitly, e.g. through a prior function call to
> bdrv_getlength() which w
We currently do not guard everywhere against a NULL bs->drv where we
should be doing so. Most of the places fixed here just do not care
about that case at all.
Some care implicitly, e.g. through a prior function call to
bdrv_getlength() which would always fail for an ejected BDS. Add an
assert t
