They behave the same as ext32s_i64 and ext32u_i64 from the constant
folding and zero propagation point of view, except that they can't
be replaced by a mov, so we don't compute the affected value.
Cc: Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net>
Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net>
---
tcg/optimize.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tcg/optimize.c b/tcg/optimize.c
index 56e0a17..155d5c3 100644
--- a/tcg/optimize.c
+++ b/tcg/optimize.c
@@ -356,9 +356,11 @@ static TCGArg do_constant_folding_2(TCGOpcode op, TCGArg
x, TCGArg y)
CASE_OP_32_64(ext16u):
return (uint16_t)x;
+ case INDEX_op_ext_i32_i64:
case INDEX_op_ext32s_i64:
return (int32_t)x;
+ case INDEX_op_extu_i32_i64:
case INDEX_op_ext32u_i64:
return (uint32_t)x;
@@ -843,6 +845,15 @@ void tcg_optimize(TCGContext *s)
mask = temps[args[1]].mask & mask;
break;
+ case INDEX_op_ext_i32_i64:
+ if ((temps[args[1]].mask & 0x80000000) != 0) {
+ break;
+ }
+ case INDEX_op_extu_i32_i64:
+ /* We do not compute affected as it is a size changing op. */
+ mask = (uint32_t)temps[args[1]].mask;
+ break;
+
CASE_OP_32_64(andc):
/* Known-zeros does not imply known-ones. Therefore unless
args[2] is constant, we can't infer anything from it. */
@@ -1021,6 +1032,8 @@ void tcg_optimize(TCGContext *s)
CASE_OP_32_64(ext16u):
case INDEX_op_ext32s_i64:
case INDEX_op_ext32u_i64:
+ case INDEX_op_ext_i32_i64:
+ case INDEX_op_extu_i32_i64:
if (temp_is_const(args[1])) {
tmp = do_constant_folding(opc, temps[args[1]].val, 0);
tcg_opt_gen_movi(s, op, args, args[0], tmp);
--
2.1.4
