Quoting Markus Armbruster (2016-12-07 05:10:47)
> "Daniel P. Berrange" writes:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 02:15:00PM -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
> >> check-qom-proplist originally added tests for verifying that
> >> object-creation helpers object_new_with_{props,propv}
"Daniel P. Berrange" writes:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 02:15:00PM -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
>> check-qom-proplist originally added tests for verifying that
>> object-creation helpers object_new_with_{props,propv} behaved in
>> similar fashion to the "traditional" method
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 02:15:00PM -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
> check-qom-proplist originally added tests for verifying that
> object-creation helpers object_new_with_{props,propv} behaved in
> similar fashion to the "traditional" method involving setting each
> individual property separately
check-qom-proplist originally added tests for verifying that
object-creation helpers object_new_with_{props,propv} behaved in
similar fashion to the "traditional" method involving setting each
individual property separately after object creation rather than
in via a single call.
Another similar