On 12/15/2016 02:46 PM, Zhang Chen wrote:
On 12/14/2016 09:00 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, Zhang Chen wrote:
Xen doesn't need this.
Could you please elaborate a bit more on what is the problem exactly,
and why we don't have any issues with migration with Xen today (COL
On 12/14/2016 09:00 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, Zhang Chen wrote:
Xen doesn't need this.
Could you please elaborate a bit more on what is the problem exactly,
and why we don't have any issues with migration with Xen today (COLO
use-case aside)?
I test COLO without thi
On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, Zhang Chen wrote:
> Xen doesn't need this.
Could you please elaborate a bit more on what is the problem exactly,
and why we don't have any issues with migration with Xen today (COLO
use-case aside)?
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen
> ---
> migration/savevm.c | 4
> 1 file c
Xen doesn't need this.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen
---
migration/savevm.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/migration/savevm.c b/migration/savevm.c
index 0363372..bec6c7e 100644
--- a/migration/savevm.c
+++ b/migration/savevm.c
@@ -1973,6 +1973,10 @@ int qemu_loadvm_state(QEM
