On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 05:03:53PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Coverity points out in CID 1390588 that the test for sh == 0
> in sdram_size() can never fire, because we calculate sh with
> sh = 1024 - ((bcr >> 6) & 0x3ff);
> which must result in a value between 1 and 1024 inclusive.
>
>
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018, Peter Maydell wrote:
Coverity points out in CID 1390588 that the test for sh == 0
in sdram_size() can never fire, because we calculate sh with
sh = 1024 - ((bcr >> 6) & 0x3ff);
which must result in a value between 1 and 1024 inclusive.
Without the relevant manual for the
Coverity points out in CID 1390588 that the test for sh == 0
in sdram_size() can never fire, because we calculate sh with
sh = 1024 - ((bcr >> 6) & 0x3ff);
which must result in a value between 1 and 1024 inclusive.
Without the relevant manual for the SoC, we're not completely
sure of the
