On 02.08.19 15:41, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 02.08.19 15:36, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 02.08.19 15:32, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>>> s390 was trying to solve limited KVM memslot size issue by abusing
>>> memory_region_allocate_system_memory(), which breaks API contract
>>> where the
On 02.08.19 15:36, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 02.08.19 15:32, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>> s390 was trying to solve limited KVM memslot size issue by abusing
>> memory_region_allocate_system_memory(), which breaks API contract
>> where the function might be called only once.
>>
>> Beside an
On 02.08.19 15:32, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> s390 was trying to solve limited KVM memslot size issue by abusing
> memory_region_allocate_system_memory(), which breaks API contract
> where the function might be called only once.
>
> Beside an invalid use of API, the approach also introduced migration
s390 was trying to solve limited KVM memslot size issue by abusing
memory_region_allocate_system_memory(), which breaks API contract
where the function might be called only once.
Beside an invalid use of API, the approach also introduced migration
issue, since RAM chunks for each