Andreas Färber writes:
> Am 27.06.2014 09:16, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
>> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>>
>>> When a device is unparented (i.e. made completely hidden from management)
>>> we want to send a DEVICE_DELETED event only if the device actually was
>>> realized. This avoids raising DEVICE
Am 27.06.2014 09:16, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>
>> When a device is unparented (i.e. made completely hidden from management)
>> we want to send a DEVICE_DELETED event only if the device actually was
>> realized. This avoids raising DEVICE_DELETED events when device_add
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> When a device is unparented (i.e. made completely hidden from management)
> we want to send a DEVICE_DELETED event only if the device actually was
> realized. This avoids raising DEVICE_DELETED events when device_add
> fails.
>
> However, this does not work right for recu
When a device is unparented (i.e. made completely hidden from management)
we want to send a DEVICE_DELETED event only if the device actually was
realized. This avoids raising DEVICE_DELETED events when device_add
fails.
However, this does not work right for recursively-deleted
devices: the whole
