Hello,
Applied to my tree, thanks!
Samuel
* Eric Blake (ebl...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On 04/07/2017 09:56 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>
> >
> >> The cleanup is useful, and resolves one of the build issues I pointed
> >> out earlier on Rawhide (looks like it is now Fedora 26 in addition to
> >> Rawhide that have new-enough gcc). In t
On 04/07/2017 09:56 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>
>> The cleanup is useful, and resolves one of the build issues I pointed
>> out earlier on Rawhide (looks like it is now Fedora 26 in addition to
>> Rawhide that have new-enough gcc). In that thread, we argued that it's
>> not going to be e
* Eric Blake (ebl...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On 04/07/2017 09:32 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
> >
> > gcc 7 (on fedora 26) objects to many of the snprintf's
> > in the smb path and command creation because it can't
> > figure out that the smb_dir (i.e. t
On 04/07/2017 09:32 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
>
> gcc 7 (on fedora 26) objects to many of the snprintf's
> in the smb path and command creation because it can't
> figure out that the smb_dir (i.e. the /tmp dir for the configuration)
> is known to be
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
gcc 7 (on fedora 26) objects to many of the snprintf's
in the smb path and command creation because it can't
figure out that the smb_dir (i.e. the /tmp dir for the configuration)
is known to be short.
Replace all these fixed length buffers by g_str* functions that
