On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 19:04:59 +0200
Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Am 05.06.2013 16:39, schrieb Igor Mammedov:
On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:29:08 +0200
Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Am 05.06.2013 15:18, schrieb Igor Mammedov:
It's a rebase of v7 on current qom-cpu tree,
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:57:11PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 5 June 2013 19:31, Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:29:46PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 05.06.2013 19:17, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
We have had this discussion before, and I remember
It's a rebase of v7 on current qom-cpu tree, since then some patches from it
were applied to master. Convertion of feature bits is left for part 2
since it's not ready yet.
v7-v8:
* split out dynamic properties convertion patch into per property patches
to simplify review
* drop feature bits
Am 05.06.2013 15:18, schrieb Igor Mammedov:
It's a rebase of v7 on current qom-cpu tree, since then some patches from it
were applied to master. Convertion of feature bits is left for part 2
since it's not ready yet.
v7-v8:
* split out dynamic properties convertion patch into per property
On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:29:08 +0200
Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Am 05.06.2013 15:18, schrieb Igor Mammedov:
It's a rebase of v7 on current qom-cpu tree, since then some patches from it
were applied to master. Convertion of feature bits is left for part 2
since it's not ready yet.
Am 05.06.2013 16:39, schrieb Igor Mammedov:
On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:29:08 +0200
Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Am 05.06.2013 15:18, schrieb Igor Mammedov:
It's a rebase of v7 on current qom-cpu tree, since then some patches from it
were applied to master. Convertion of feature bits
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:04:59PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 05.06.2013 16:39, schrieb Igor Mammedov:
On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:29:08 +0200
Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Am 05.06.2013 15:18, schrieb Igor Mammedov:
It's a rebase of v7 on current qom-cpu tree, since then some
Am 05.06.2013 19:17, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:04:59PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 05.06.2013 16:39, schrieb Igor Mammedov:
On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:29:08 +0200
Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Why is conversion of dynamic properties to static properties
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:29:46PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 05.06.2013 19:17, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:04:59PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 05.06.2013 16:39, schrieb Igor Mammedov:
On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:29:08 +0200
Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de
On 5 June 2013 19:31, Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:29:46PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 05.06.2013 19:17, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
We have had this discussion before, and I remember Anthony saying that
anything set using global properties _must_ be
10 matches
Mail list logo