Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 00/15 v8] target-i386: convert CPU features into properties, part 1

2013-06-11 Thread Igor Mammedov
On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 19:04:59 +0200 Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote: Am 05.06.2013 16:39, schrieb Igor Mammedov: On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:29:08 +0200 Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote: Am 05.06.2013 15:18, schrieb Igor Mammedov: It's a rebase of v7 on current qom-cpu tree,

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 00/15 v8] target-i386: convert CPU features into properties, part 1

2013-06-06 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:57:11PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: On 5 June 2013 19:31, Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:29:46PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 05.06.2013 19:17, schrieb Eduardo Habkost: We have had this discussion before, and I remember

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 00/15 v8] target-i386: convert CPU features into properties, part 1

2013-06-05 Thread Igor Mammedov
It's a rebase of v7 on current qom-cpu tree, since then some patches from it were applied to master. Convertion of feature bits is left for part 2 since it's not ready yet. v7-v8: * split out dynamic properties convertion patch into per property patches to simplify review * drop feature bits

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 00/15 v8] target-i386: convert CPU features into properties, part 1

2013-06-05 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 05.06.2013 15:18, schrieb Igor Mammedov: It's a rebase of v7 on current qom-cpu tree, since then some patches from it were applied to master. Convertion of feature bits is left for part 2 since it's not ready yet. v7-v8: * split out dynamic properties convertion patch into per property

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 00/15 v8] target-i386: convert CPU features into properties, part 1

2013-06-05 Thread Igor Mammedov
On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:29:08 +0200 Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote: Am 05.06.2013 15:18, schrieb Igor Mammedov: It's a rebase of v7 on current qom-cpu tree, since then some patches from it were applied to master. Convertion of feature bits is left for part 2 since it's not ready yet.

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 00/15 v8] target-i386: convert CPU features into properties, part 1

2013-06-05 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 05.06.2013 16:39, schrieb Igor Mammedov: On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:29:08 +0200 Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote: Am 05.06.2013 15:18, schrieb Igor Mammedov: It's a rebase of v7 on current qom-cpu tree, since then some patches from it were applied to master. Convertion of feature bits

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 00/15 v8] target-i386: convert CPU features into properties, part 1

2013-06-05 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:04:59PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 05.06.2013 16:39, schrieb Igor Mammedov: On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:29:08 +0200 Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote: Am 05.06.2013 15:18, schrieb Igor Mammedov: It's a rebase of v7 on current qom-cpu tree, since then some

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 00/15 v8] target-i386: convert CPU features into properties, part 1

2013-06-05 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 05.06.2013 19:17, schrieb Eduardo Habkost: On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:04:59PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 05.06.2013 16:39, schrieb Igor Mammedov: On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:29:08 +0200 Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote: Why is conversion of dynamic properties to static properties

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 00/15 v8] target-i386: convert CPU features into properties, part 1

2013-06-05 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:29:46PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 05.06.2013 19:17, schrieb Eduardo Habkost: On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:04:59PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 05.06.2013 16:39, schrieb Igor Mammedov: On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:29:08 +0200 Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 00/15 v8] target-i386: convert CPU features into properties, part 1

2013-06-05 Thread Peter Maydell
On 5 June 2013 19:31, Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:29:46PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 05.06.2013 19:17, schrieb Eduardo Habkost: We have had this discussion before, and I remember Anthony saying that anything set using global properties _must_ be