Hi Guys,
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Ming Lei ming@canonical.com wrote:
This test runs dummy function with coroutine by using
two enter and one yield since which is a common usage.
So we can see the cost introduced by corouting for running
one function, for example:
Run
Am 13.08.2014 um 12:08 hat Ming Lei geschrieben:
This test runs dummy function with coroutine by using
two enter and one yield since which is a common usage.
So we can see the cost introduced by corouting for running
one function, for example:
Run operation 2000 iterations
This test runs dummy function with coroutine by using
two enter and one yield since which is a common usage.
So we can see the cost introduced by corouting for running
one function, for example:
Run operation 2000 iterations 4.841071 s, 4131K operations/s
242ns per coroutine
The Wednesday 13 Aug 2014 à 18:08:47 (+0800), Ming Lei wrote :
This test runs dummy function with coroutine by using
two enter and one yield since which is a common usage.
So we can see the cost introduced by corouting for running
one function, for example:
Run operation 2000
On 13 août 2014 16:27:29 CEST, Benoît Canet benoit.ca...@irqsave.net wrote:
The Wednesday 13 Aug 2014 à 18:08:47 (+0800), Ming Lei wrote :
This test runs dummy function with coroutine by using
two enter and one yield since which is a common usage.
So we can see the cost introduced by
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Benoît Canet benoit.ca...@irqsave.net wrote:
The Wednesday 13 Aug 2014 à 18:08:47 (+0800), Ming Lei wrote :
This test runs dummy function with coroutine by using
two enter and one yield since which is a common usage.
So we can see the cost introduced by
