Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/4] m68k: Add basic support for the NeXTcube machine

2018-07-03 Thread Natalia Portillo
Now you've made me subscribe again to qemu-devel ;) On 30/06/18 18:07, Bryce Lanham wrote: > Oh hi!  > > Luckily gmail brought this to the top since I don’t pay attention to the > list. I’m away from my computer at the moment, but I had more than this > working, including interrupts, Ethernet, an

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/4] m68k: Add basic support for the NeXTcube machine

2018-06-30 Thread Bryce Lanham
Oh hi! Luckily gmail brought this to the top since I don’t pay attention to the list. I’m away from my computer at the moment, but I had more than this working, including interrupts, Ethernet, and SCSI for sure. ( https://i.imgur.com/Py0FO.png) I’d love to dive back into this now that 68040 suppor

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/4] m68k: Add basic support for the NeXTcube machine

2018-06-30 Thread Thomas Huth
Am Sat, 30 Jun 2018 12:07:01 -0500 schrieb Bryce Lanham : > Oh hi! > > Luckily gmail brought this to the top since I don’t pay attention to > the list. I’m away from my computer at the moment, but I had more > than this working, including interrupts, Ethernet, and SCSI for sure. > ( https://i.img

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/4] m68k: Add basic support for the NeXTcube machine

2018-06-30 Thread Thomas Huth
Am Sat, 30 Jun 2018 14:17:32 +0100 schrieb Peter Maydell : > On 30 June 2018 at 14:14, Thomas Huth wrote: > > Weird... the mail was ca. 1200 lines ... that not small, but not so > > big that I'd expect that it would get blocked somewhere. Let's wait > > some more more hours, maybe the spam filter

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/4] m68k: Add basic support for the NeXTcube machine

2018-06-30 Thread Peter Maydell
On 30 June 2018 at 14:14, Thomas Huth wrote: > Weird... the mail was ca. 1200 lines ... that not small, but not so > big that I'd expect that it would get blocked somewhere. Let's wait > some more more hours, maybe the spam filter is just very slow today. If > it is then still not available on the

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/4] m68k: Add basic support for the NeXTcube machine

2018-06-30 Thread Thomas Huth
Am Sat, 30 Jun 2018 10:42:56 +0100 schrieb Mark Cave-Ayland : > On 30/06/18 09:33, Thomas Huth wrote: > > > During Google Summer of Code 2011, Bryce Lanham added the > > possibility to emulate the NeXTcube machine in QEMU, e.g. see this > > URL for some details: > > > > https://wiki.qemu.org/Goo

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/4] m68k: Add basic support for the NeXTcube machine

2018-06-30 Thread Mark Cave-Ayland
On 30/06/18 09:33, Thomas Huth wrote: During Google Summer of Code 2011, Bryce Lanham added the possibility to emulate the NeXTcube machine in QEMU, e.g. see this URL for some details: https://wiki.qemu.org/Google_Summer_of_Code_2011#NeXT_machines_system_emulation But since the machine require

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/4] m68k: Add basic support for the NeXTcube machine

2018-06-30 Thread Thomas Huth
During Google Summer of Code 2011, Bryce Lanham added the possibility to emulate the NeXTcube machine in QEMU, e.g. see this URL for some details: https://wiki.qemu.org/Google_Summer_of_Code_2011#NeXT_machines_system_emulation But since the machine requires a 68040 CPU and this was not included i