On 06/11/2017 09:54, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 11/06/2017 09:52 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 19:58:15 +0100
Halil Pasic wrote:
On 10/30/2017 06:38 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 30/10/2017 18:08, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 10/30/2017
On 11/06/2017 09:52 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 19:58:15 +0100
> Halil Pasic wrote:
>
>> On 10/30/2017 06:38 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>>> On 30/10/2017 18:08, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 10/30/2017 05:59 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 19:58:15 +0100
Halil Pasic wrote:
> On 10/30/2017 06:38 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
> > On 30/10/2017 18:08, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/30/2017 05:59 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 14:48:23 +0100
> >>> Christian
On 10/30/2017 06:38 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 30/10/2017 18:08, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>> On 10/30/2017 05:59 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 14:48:23 +0100
>>> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>
>>>
FWIW, I am testing a guest patch
On 30/10/2017 18:08, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 10/30/2017 05:59 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 14:48:23 +0100
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
FWIW, I am testing a guest patch that enables zPCI without AIS. Its as simple as
diff --git
On 10/30/2017 05:59 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 14:48:23 +0100
> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
>> FWIW, I am testing a guest patch that enables zPCI without AIS. Its as
>> simple as
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 14:48:23 +0100
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> FWIW, I am testing a guest patch that enables zPCI without AIS. Its as simple
> as
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
> index 7b30af5..9b24836 100644
> ---
On 10/30/2017 02:48 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 10/30/2017 02:44 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> On 30/10/2017 13:44, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/30/2017 01:42 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 09:28:09 +0100
Christian Borntraeger
On 10/30/2017 02:44 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 30/10/2017 13:44, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/30/2017 01:42 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 09:28:09 +0100
>>> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>
Now I thought about that for a while and
On 30/10/2017 13:44, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 10/30/2017 01:42 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 09:28:09 +0100
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Now I thought about that for a while and I start to think that we cannot
implement ais
in QEMU and cover
On 10/30/2017 01:42 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 09:28:09 +0100
> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>> Now I thought about that for a while and I start to think that we cannot
>> implement ais
>> in QEMU and cover all cases.
>> One aspect was certainly
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 09:28:09 +0100
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Now I thought about that for a while and I start to think that we cannot
> implement ais
> in QEMU and cover all cases.
> One aspect was certainly passthrough (like you handled in patch 4).
> Another
Now I thought about that for a while and I start to think that we cannot
implement ais
in QEMU and cover all cases.
One aspect was certainly passthrough (like you handled in patch 4).
Another aspect is that some interrupts might be injected from the kernel - even
for
emulated devices. e.g.
Currently AIS support has several problems:
- AIS support in KVM is reported if KVM has AIS capability.
- Testing if KVM FLIC attributes for AIS are supported does not take into
account if AIS is supported by KVM.
- KVM report supporting the AIS FLIC features but denies their usage
if the
14 matches
Mail list logo