On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 08:31:55PM +0100, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 03.01.2017 19:27, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > When integrating the crypto support with qcow/qcow2, we don't
> > want to use the bare LUKS option names "hash-alg", "key-secret",
> > etc. We want to namespace them "luks-hash-alg", "luk
On 03.01.2017 19:27, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> When integrating the crypto support with qcow/qcow2, we don't
> want to use the bare LUKS option names "hash-alg", "key-secret",
> etc. We want to namespace them "luks-hash-alg", "luks-key-secret"
> so that they don't clash with any general qcow opti
When integrating the crypto support with qcow/qcow2, we don't
want to use the bare LUKS option names "hash-alg", "key-secret",
etc. We want to namespace them "luks-hash-alg", "luks-key-secret"
so that they don't clash with any general qcow options at a later
date.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange
