On Wed, 31 May 2017 19:40:46 +0200
Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> On Wed, 31 May 2017 19:06:29 +0200
> Greg Kurz wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 31 May 2017 18:51:06 +0200
> > Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > >
> > > > >
Claudio Imbrenda writes:
> On Wed, 31 May 2017 19:06:29 +0200
> Greg Kurz wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 31 May 2017 18:51:06 +0200
>> Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
>> [...]
>> > > >
>> > > > This is strange. cpu_index() is defined as:
On Wed, 31 May 2017 19:06:29 +0200
Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Wed, 31 May 2017 18:51:06 +0200
> Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> [...]
> > > >
> > > > This is strange. cpu_index() is defined as:
> > > >
> > > > static inline int cpu_index(CPUState *cpu)
> > >
Claudio Imbrenda writes:
> On Wed, 31 May 2017 18:33:24 +0200
> Greg Kurz wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 31 May 2017 18:17:37 +0200
>> Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, 31 May 2017 16:09:33 +0100
>> > Alex Bennée
On Wed, 31 May 2017 18:51:06 +0200
Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
[...]
> > >
> > > This is strange. cpu_index() is defined as:
> > >
> > > static inline int cpu_index(CPUState *cpu)
> > > {
> > > #if defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> > > return cpu->host_tid;
> > > #else
>
On Wed, 31 May 2017 18:33:24 +0200
Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Wed, 31 May 2017 18:17:37 +0200
> Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 31 May 2017 16:09:33 +0100
> > Alex Bennée wrote:
> >
> > > The thread-id of 0 means any CPU
On Wed, 31 May 2017 18:17:37 +0200
Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> On Wed, 31 May 2017 16:09:33 +0100
> Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> > The thread-id of 0 means any CPU but we then ignore the fact we find
> > the first_cpu in this case who can have an
Greg Kurz writes:
> On Wed, 31 May 2017 16:09:33 +0100
> Alex Bennée wrote:
>
>> The thread-id of 0 means any CPU but we then ignore the fact we find
>> the first_cpu in this case who can have an index of 0. Instead of
>
> The index can never be 0 in
Claudio Imbrenda writes:
> On Wed, 31 May 2017 16:09:33 +0100
> Alex Bennée wrote:
>
>> The thread-id of 0 means any CPU but we then ignore the fact we find
>> the first_cpu in this case who can have an index of 0. Instead of
>> bailing out
On Wed, 31 May 2017 16:09:33 +0100
Alex Bennée wrote:
> The thread-id of 0 means any CPU but we then ignore the fact we find
> the first_cpu in this case who can have an index of 0. Instead of
> bailing out just test if we have managed to match up thread-id to a
> CPU.
>
On Wed, 31 May 2017 16:09:33 +0100
Alex Bennée wrote:
> The thread-id of 0 means any CPU but we then ignore the fact we find
> the first_cpu in this case who can have an index of 0. Instead of
The index can never be 0 in system mode actually, but you're right that this
The thread-id of 0 means any CPU but we then ignore the fact we find
the first_cpu in this case who can have an index of 0. Instead of
bailing out just test if we have managed to match up thread-id to a
CPU.
Otherwise you get:
gdb_handle_packet: command='vCont;C04:0;c'
put_packet: reply='E22'
12 matches
Mail list logo