On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 09:43:43AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 22.07.19 05:04, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 06:01:20PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> Using the address of a RAMBlock to test for a matching pbp is not really
> >> safe. Instead, let's use the guest ph
On 22.07.19 05:04, David Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 06:01:20PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> Using the address of a RAMBlock to test for a matching pbp is not really
>> safe. Instead, let's use the guest physical address of the base page
>> along with the page size (via the number
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 06:01:20PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Using the address of a RAMBlock to test for a matching pbp is not really
> safe. Instead, let's use the guest physical address of the base page
> along with the page size (via the number of subpages).
>
> While at it, move "struc
Using the address of a RAMBlock to test for a matching pbp is not really
safe. Instead, let's use the guest physical address of the base page
along with the page size (via the number of subpages).
While at it, move "struct PartiallyBalloonedPage" to virtio-balloon.h
now (previously most probably a
