Just put RAM regions in the unimplemented spaces in the MMIO region. These
regions have undefined behaviour, but this at least stops QEMU from segfaulting
when the guest bangs on these registers (and sucessfully fakes reading and
writing the registers with no side effects).
Signed-off-by: Peter
On 10/25/12 11:47, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
Just put RAM regions in the unimplemented spaces in the MMIO region. These
regions have undefined behaviour, but this at least stops QEMU from
segfaulting
when the guest bangs on these registers (and sucessfully fakes reading and
writing the
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/25/12 11:47, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
Just put RAM regions in the unimplemented spaces in the MMIO region. These
regions have undefined behaviour, but this at least stops QEMU from
segfaulting
when the guest bangs
On 25 October 2012 14:03, Peter Crosthwaite
peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/25/12 11:47, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
Just put RAM regions in the unimplemented spaces in the MMIO region. These
regions have undefined
On 10/25/2012 03:03 PM, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/25/12 11:47, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
Just put RAM regions in the unimplemented spaces in the MMIO region. These
regions have undefined behaviour, but this at least
On 10/25/2012 03:12 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
(2) what should the memory system do for accesses where there is
no memory region? This is really system specific as it depends
what the bus fabric does. For ARM the usual thing would be to
generate a decode error response which will result in
On 25 October 2012 14:21, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/25/2012 03:12 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
(2) what should the memory system do for accesses where there is
no memory region? This is really system specific as it depends
what the bus fabric does. For ARM the usual thing would be
On 10/25/2012 03:28 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 25 October 2012 14:21, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/25/2012 03:12 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
(2) what should the memory system do for accesses where there is
no memory region? This is really system specific as it depends
what the bus
On 25 October 2012 14:41, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/25/2012 03:28 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 25 October 2012 14:21, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
You could easily have the top-level container have -ops that generate
an exception.
Ah, yes, there's an 'accepts' callback.
On 10/25/2012 03:50 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 25 October 2012 14:41, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/25/2012 03:28 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 25 October 2012 14:21, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
You could easily have the top-level container have -ops that generate
an exception.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Peter Maydell
peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 25 October 2012 14:41, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/25/2012 03:28 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 25 October 2012 14:21, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
You could easily have the top-level container
On 25 October 2012 14:59, Peter Crosthwaite
peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Peter Maydell
peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 25 October 2012 14:41, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
wrt decode duplication, I've been thinking of a single -service()
12 matches
Mail list logo
