On 29.11.2017 19:18, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 11/28/2017 08:33 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> -void program_interrupt(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t code, int ilen)
>> +void program_interrupt_ra(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t code, int ilen,
>> + uintptr_t ra)
>> {
>>
On 11/28/2017 08:33 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> -void program_interrupt(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t code, int ilen)
> +void program_interrupt_ra(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t code, int ilen,
> + uintptr_t ra)
> {
> S390CPU *cpu = s390_env_get_cpu(env);
>
> q
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 21:33:24 +0100
David Hildenbrand wrote:
> All users are gone, we can finally drop it and make sure that all new
> new program interrupt injections are reminded of the retaddr - as they
s/new new/new/
> have to use program_interrupt_ra() now.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenb
All users are gone, we can finally drop it and make sure that all new
new program interrupt injections are reminded of the retaddr - as they
have to use program_interrupt_ra() now.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand
---
target/s390x/cpu.h | 1 -
target/s390x/interrupt.c | 22 ---
