On 04/24/2015 09:36 AM, Baptiste Reynal wrote:
I think it will be a pity to postpone VFIO support on QEMU and would
rather introduce the support for VIRT_MMIO later.
Alex, what is your position on it ?
Ah, sorry, I read this mail too late. Converting virtio-mmio to a
dynamic sysbus device
On 04/27/2015 04:02 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 04/24/2015 09:36 AM, Baptiste Reynal wrote:
I think it will be a pity to postpone VFIO support on QEMU and would
rather introduce the support for VIRT_MMIO later.
Alex, what is your position on it ?
Ah, sorry, I read this mail too late.
I think it will be a pity to postpone VFIO support on QEMU and would
rather introduce the support for VIRT_MMIO later.
Alex, what is your position on it ?
Best regards,
Baptiste
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Eric Auger eric.au...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Baptiste,
Well I need to increase the
Hi Eric,
Is there anything still blocking this patch ? Can I get the status ?
Thanks,
Baptiste
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Eric Auger eric.au...@linaro.org wrote:
This patch series enables machvirt to dynamically instantiate sysbus
devices from command line (using -device option).
All
Hi Baptiste,
Well I need to increase the size of the platform bus mmio and number of
IRQs according to Alex' advice and hence move it after VIRTIO_MMIO for
alignment reason. This is a small change I can carry out by tomorrow.
Then Alex proposed to bind VIRT_MMIO to the platform bus. This sounds
This patch series enables machvirt to dynamically instantiate sysbus
devices from command line (using -device option).
All those sysbus devices are plugged onto a platform bus. This latter
device is instantiated in machvirt and takes care of the binding of
children sysbus devices on a machine
