On 05.05.2017 22:13, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/05/2017 03:06 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 04.05.2017 05:07, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> We had some conflicting documentation: a nice 8-way table that
>>> described all possible combinations of DATA, ZERO, and
>>> OFFSET_VALID, contrasted with text that impli
On 05/05/2017 03:06 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 04.05.2017 05:07, Eric Blake wrote:
>> We had some conflicting documentation: a nice 8-way table that
>> described all possible combinations of DATA, ZERO, and
>> OFFSET_VALID, contrasted with text that implied that OFFSET_VALID
>> always meant raw data
On 04.05.2017 05:07, Eric Blake wrote:
> We had some conflicting documentation: a nice 8-way table that
> described all possible combinations of DATA, ZERO, and
> OFFSET_VALID, contrasted with text that implied that OFFSET_VALID
> always meant raw data could be read directly. Furthermore, the
> te
We had some conflicting documentation: a nice 8-way table that
described all possible combinations of DATA, ZERO, and
OFFSET_VALID, contrasted with text that implied that OFFSET_VALID
always meant raw data could be read directly. Furthermore, the
text refers a lot to bs->file, even though the inte
