On 20.09.2016 20:20, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 7 September 2016 at 14:22, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> Currently, periodic counter wraps around immediately once counter reaches
>> "0", this is wrong behaviour for some of the timers, resulting in one period
>> being lost. Add new
On 7 September 2016 at 14:22, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Currently, periodic counter wraps around immediately once counter reaches
> "0", this is wrong behaviour for some of the timers, resulting in one period
> being lost. Add new ptimer policy that provides correct behaviour for
Currently, periodic counter wraps around immediately once counter reaches
"0", this is wrong behaviour for some of the timers, resulting in one period
being lost. Add new ptimer policy that provides correct behaviour for such
timers, so that counter stays with "0" for a one period before wrapping