On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 09:35:45 +0200
"Michael Fritscher" wrote:
> Good day,
>
Hi!
> only a short announcement: Sorry for the very long delay :-( But I'm
> working on this again. The biggest issue seems to be the *at stuff. I'll
> try to workaround this via getting the
Good day,
only a short announcement: Sorry for the very long delay :-( But I'm
working on this again. The biggest issue seems to be the *at stuff. I'll
try to workaround this via getting the directories' path from the file
descriptor with the /proc (as it is already done in the 9pfs_utils) -
On Mon, 9 May 2016 11:12:51 +0200
"Michael Fritscher" wrote:
> Hello Greg,
>
Hi Michael !
> I commented your comments :-)
>
> To summerize:
> * I didn't know where to put the win32 specific functions/wrappers -
> thanks showing me the locations!
> * Binary mode is
Hello Greg,
I commented your comments :-)
To summerize:
* I didn't know where to put the win32 specific functions/wrappers -
thanks showing me the locations!
* Binary mode is needed by Windows - else newlines are screwed up.
* Windows is way more picky than Linux regarding paths.
* Which
More comments.
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:52:00 +0200
Michael Fritscher wrote:
> It was tested on Windows & Linux hosts, on the later no obvious regressions
> could be found. The guest was a Knoppix 7.6.0 live cd.
>
> This is WIP and a RFC - it isn't meant to be upstreamed
Hi Michael,
I have some more comments that should end up in a preliminary patch.
Cheers.
--
Greg
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:52:00 +0200
Michael Fritscher wrote:
> It was tested on Windows & Linux hosts, on the later no obvious regressions
> could be found. The guest was a
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:52:00 +0200
Michael Fritscher wrote:
> It was tested on Windows & Linux hosts, on the later no obvious regressions
> could be found. The guest was a Knoppix 7.6.0 live cd.
>
> This is WIP and a RFC - it isn't meant to be upstreamed yet. The
It was tested on Windows & Linux hosts, on the later no obvious regressions
could be found. The guest was a Knoppix 7.6.0 live cd.
This is WIP and a RFC - it isn't meant to be upstreamed yet. The error_printf
are only for debugging and will be deleted in the final patch.
There are some