On 28 September 2015 at 17:23, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> No conclusion was reached here.
> I'm ready to send a patch to fix other comments.
>
> Peter, if you really want this field, I can play with the padfields to
> convert it. Just say.
If it's not too painful I think it would be preferable to co
Le 28/09/2015 15:57, Riku Voipio a écrit :
> On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:03:11AM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 04/09/2015 15:35, Peter Maydell a écrit :
>>> On 3 September 2015 at 00:58, Laurent Vivier wrote:
This patch introduces a system very similar to the one used in the kerne
On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:03:11AM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
>
> Le 04/09/2015 15:35, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> > On 3 September 2015 at 00:58, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> >> This patch introduces a system very similar to the one used in the kernel
> >> to attach specific functions to a given f
Le 04/09/2015 15:35, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> On 3 September 2015 at 00:58, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> This patch introduces a system very similar to the one used in the kernel
>> to attach specific functions to a given file descriptor.
>>
>> In this case, we attach a specific "host_to_target()"
On 3 September 2015 at 00:58, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> This patch introduces a system very similar to the one used in the kernel
> to attach specific functions to a given file descriptor.
>
> In this case, we attach a specific "host_to_target()" translator to the fd
> returned by signalfd() to be a
This patch introduces a system very similar to the one used in the kernel
to attach specific functions to a given file descriptor.
In this case, we attach a specific "host_to_target()" translator to the fd
returned by signalfd() to be able to byte-swap the signalfd_siginfo
structure provided by re
