14.09.2017 16:49, Eric Blake wrote:
> When using bit-wise operations that exploit the power-of-two
> nature of the second argument of ROUND_UP(), we still need to
> ensure that the mask is as wide as the first argument (done
> by using a ternary to force proper arithmetic promotion).
> Unpatched,
On 09/14/2017 06:49 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> When using bit-wise operations that exploit the power-of-two
> nature of the second argument of ROUND_UP(), we still need to
> ensure that the mask is as wide as the first argument (done
> by using a ternary to force proper arithmetic promotion).
>
On 09/14/17 15:49, Eric Blake wrote:
> When using bit-wise operations that exploit the power-of-two
> nature of the second argument of ROUND_UP(), we still need to
> ensure that the mask is as wide as the first argument (done
> by using a ternary to force proper arithmetic promotion).
> Unpatched,
When using bit-wise operations that exploit the power-of-two
nature of the second argument of ROUND_UP(), we still need to
ensure that the mask is as wide as the first argument (done
by using a ternary to force proper arithmetic promotion).
Unpatched, ROUND_UP(2ULL*1024*1024*1024*1024, 512U)
