On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 09:01:11AM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > +// - this is not a guest io, but a reply, so async_io isn't
> > set.
>
> Please use checkpatch.pl to avoid C99 comments.
>
Doh, I must have missed it (I do), will fix, thanks.
Alon
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Alon Levy wrote:
> bumps spice-protocol to 0.12.0 for new IO.
> revision bumped to 4 for new IO support, enabled for spice-server >= 0.11.1
> on migration reissue spice_qxl_monitors_config_async.
>
> RHBZ: 770842
>
> Signed-off-by: Alon Levy
> ---
> configure
bumps spice-protocol to 0.12.0 for new IO.
revision bumped to 4 for new IO support, enabled for spice-server >= 0.11.1
on migration reissue spice_qxl_monitors_config_async.
RHBZ: 770842
Signed-off-by: Alon Levy
---
configure |2 +-
hw/qxl.c | 47
Hi,
On 07/25/2012 08:29 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:00:21PM +0300, Yonit Halperin wrote:
Hi,
I think you should save the monitor configuration as part of the vmstate,
and recall spice_qxl_monitors_config_async in qxl_post_load.
Good point, will do. Would be nice if I could
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:00:21PM +0300, Yonit Halperin wrote:
> Hi,
> I think you should save the monitor configuration as part of the vmstate,
> and recall spice_qxl_monitors_config_async in qxl_post_load.
Good point, will do. Would be nice if I could differentiate same client
(that doesn't nee
Hi,
I think you should save the monitor configuration as part of the
vmstate, and recall spice_qxl_monitors_config_async in qxl_post_load.
Regards,
Yonit.
On 07/23/2012 07:33 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
bumps spice-protocol to 0.12.0 for new IO.
revision bumped to 4 for new IO support, enabled for s
bumps spice-protocol to 0.12.0 for new IO.
revision bumped to 4 for new IO support, enabled for spice-server >= 0.11.1
RHBZ: 770842
Signed-off-by: Alon Levy
---
v2: fixed interface_async_complete_io to not complain about unexpected async io.
configure|2 +-
hw/qxl.c | 30
