On 1/3/19 11:21 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Otherwise the patch looks good, so if you agree I'll apply
> it to target-arm.next with the flag renamed back to BE_DATA.
No good reason, I just thought it was shorter.
Renaming it back is fine.
r~
On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 16:43, Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> Use "register" TBFLAG_ANY to indicate shared state between
> A32 and A64, and "registers" TBFLAG_A32 & TBFLAG_A64 for
> fields that are specific to the given cpu state.
>
> Move ARM_TBFLAG_BE to shared state, instead of its current
> place
On 12/18/18 5:43 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Use "register" TBFLAG_ANY to indicate shared state between
> A32 and A64, and "registers" TBFLAG_A32 & TBFLAG_A64 for
> fields that are specific to the given cpu state.
>
> Move ARM_TBFLAG_BE to shared state, instead of its current
> placement within
Use "register" TBFLAG_ANY to indicate shared state between
A32 and A64, and "registers" TBFLAG_A32 & TBFLAG_A64 for
fields that are specific to the given cpu state.
Move ARM_TBFLAG_BE to shared state, instead of its current
placement within "Bit usage when in AArch32 state".
Signed-off-by: Richar
