Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target-arm: implement PD0/PD1 bits for TTBCR

2014-06-10 Thread Peter Maydell
On 10 June 2014 18:00, Aggeler Fabian wrote: > Obviously not v2 but v3 (subject). Sorry for that, please ignore it as I am > going to resend. You don't need to resend just for that. Applied to target-arm.next. thanks -- PMM

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target-arm: implement PD0/PD1 bits for TTBCR

2014-06-10 Thread Aggeler Fabian
Obviously not v2 but v3 (subject). Sorry for that, please ignore it as I am going to resend. Regards, Fabian On 10 Jun 2014, at 16:12, Fabian Aggeler wrote: > Corrected handling of writes to TTBCR for ARMv8 (previously UNK/SBZP > bits are not RES0) and ARMv7 (new bits PD0/PD1 for CPUs with Sec

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target-arm: implement PD0/PD1 bits for TTBCR

2014-06-10 Thread Fabian Aggeler
Corrected handling of writes to TTBCR for ARMv8 (previously UNK/SBZP bits are not RES0) and ARMv7 (new bits PD0/PD1 for CPUs with Security Extensions). Bits PD0/PD1 are now respected in get_phys_addr_v6/v5() and get_level1_table_address. Signed-off-by: Fabian Aggeler --- v2 -> v3: * rebased * in

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target-arm: implement PD0/PD1 bits for TTBCR

2014-06-10 Thread Aggeler Fabian
On 09 Jun 2014, at 17:18, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 9 June 2014 12:27, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 5 June 2014 11:39, Fabian Aggeler wrote: >>> Corrected handling of writes to TTBCR for ARMv8 (previously UNK/SBZP >>> bits are not RES0) and ARMv7 (new bits PD0/PD1 for CPUs with Security >>> Exte

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target-arm: implement PD0/PD1 bits for TTBCR

2014-06-09 Thread Peter Maydell
On 9 June 2014 12:27, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 5 June 2014 11:39, Fabian Aggeler wrote: >> Corrected handling of writes to TTBCR for ARMv8 (previously UNK/SBZP >> bits are not RES0) and ARMv7 (new bits PD0/PD1 for CPUs with Security >> Extensions). >> >> Bits PD0/PD1 are now respected in get_phy

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target-arm: implement PD0/PD1 bits for TTBCR

2014-06-09 Thread Peter Maydell
On 5 June 2014 11:39, Fabian Aggeler wrote: > Corrected handling of writes to TTBCR for ARMv8 (previously UNK/SBZP > bits are not RES0) and ARMv7 (new bits PD0/PD1 for CPUs with Security > Extensions). > > Bits PD0/PD1 are now respected in get_phys_addr_v6/v5() and > get_level1_table_address. > >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target-arm: implement PD0/PD1 bits for TTBCR

2014-06-05 Thread Greg Bellows
Reviewed by: Greg Bellows On 5 June 2014 05:39, Fabian Aggeler wrote: > Corrected handling of writes to TTBCR for ARMv8 (previously UNK/SBZP > bits are not RES0) and ARMv7 (new bits PD0/PD1 for CPUs with Security > Extensions). > > Bits PD0/PD1 are now respected in get_phys_addr_v6/v5() and >

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target-arm: implement PD0/PD1 bits for TTBCR

2014-06-05 Thread Fabian Aggeler
Corrected handling of writes to TTBCR for ARMv8 (previously UNK/SBZP bits are not RES0) and ARMv7 (new bits PD0/PD1 for CPUs with Security Extensions). Bits PD0/PD1 are now respected in get_phys_addr_v6/v5() and get_level1_table_address. Signed-off-by: Fabian Aggeler --- v1 -> v2: * dropped chan