On Mon, 19 Oct 2015, Leon Alrae wrote:
> >> Instructions recip.{s|d} and rsqrt.{s|d} do not require 64-bit FPU neither
> >> they require any particular mode for its FPU. This patch removes the checks
> >> that may break a program that uses these instructions.
> >
> > That is correct. That said
On 11/10/15 21:30, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> (sorry for the late answer)
>
> On 2015-08-26 14:12, Petar Jovanovic wrote:
>> From: Petar Jovanovic
>>
>> Instructions recip.{s|d} and rsqrt.{s|d} do not require 64-bit FPU neither
>> they require any particular mode for its
Oops my email client dropped Aurelien's email from CC for some reason...
(adding back)
On 19/10/15 17:40, Leon Alrae wrote:
> On 11/10/15 21:30, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> (sorry for the late answer)
>>
>> On 2015-08-26 14:12, Petar Jovanovic wrote:
>>> From: Petar Jovanovic
(sorry for the late answer)
On 2015-08-26 14:12, Petar Jovanovic wrote:
> From: Petar Jovanovic
>
> Instructions recip.{s|d} and rsqrt.{s|d} do not require 64-bit FPU neither
> they require any particular mode for its FPU. This patch removes the checks
> that may
On 26/08/2015 13:12, Petar Jovanovic wrote:
> From: Petar Jovanovic
>
> Instructions recip.{s|d} and rsqrt.{s|d} do not require 64-bit FPU neither
> they require any particular mode for its FPU. This patch removes the checks
> that may break a program that uses these
From: Petar Jovanovic petar.jovano...@imgtec.com
Instructions recip.{s|d} and rsqrt.{s|d} do not require 64-bit FPU neither
they require any particular mode for its FPU. This patch removes the checks
that may break a program that uses these instructions.
Signed-off-by: Petar Jovanovic