On 2011-09-29 16:58, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 09/29/2011 04:31 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> x86 cannot provide an optimized generic deposit implementation. But at
>> least for a few special cases, namely for writing bits 0..7, 8..15, and
>> 0..15, versions using only a single instruction are feasi
On 09/29/2011 04:31 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> x86 cannot provide an optimized generic deposit implementation. But at
> least for a few special cases, namely for writing bits 0..7, 8..15, and
> 0..15, versions using only a single instruction are feasible.
> Introducing such limited support improves em
x86 cannot provide an optimized generic deposit implementation. But at
least for a few special cases, namely for writing bits 0..7, 8..15, and
0..15, versions using only a single instruction are feasible.
Introducing such limited support improves emulating 16-bit x86 code on
x86, but also rarer cas
