Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] New sigaltstack backend for coroutine

2012-03-09 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 28.02.2012 12:25, schrieb Alex Barcelo: > This series of patches implements coroutines method with > sigaltstack. > > The flow of creation and management of the coroutines is > quite similar to the coroutine-ucontext.c. The way to use > sigaltstack to achieve the needed stack manipulation is >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] New sigaltstack backend for coroutine

2012-03-08 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Alex Barcelo wrote: > On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 23:17, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 7 March 2012 22:01, Alex Barcelo wrote: >>> Is this patch okay? The first version had some comments, and now the >>> v2 has been a bit too silent, not sure if that's a good sign or a b

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] New sigaltstack backend for coroutine

2012-03-07 Thread Peter Maydell
On 7 March 2012 22:44, Alex Barcelo wrote: > On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 23:17, Peter Maydell wrote: >> Did you see the comment I added to an earlier thread regarding >> FORTIFY_SOURCE? > > Sorry about that! Yes, I got the comment mixed between some other > threads, and now I was checking and didn't r

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] New sigaltstack backend for coroutine

2012-03-07 Thread Alex Barcelo
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 23:17, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 7 March 2012 22:01, Alex Barcelo wrote: >> Is this patch okay? The first version had some comments, and now the >> v2 has been a bit too silent, not sure if that's a good sign or a bad >> sign. > > Did you see the comment I added to an earli

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] New sigaltstack backend for coroutine

2012-03-07 Thread Peter Maydell
On 7 March 2012 22:01, Alex Barcelo wrote: > Is this patch okay? The first version had some comments, and now the > v2 has been a bit too silent, not sure if that's a good sign or a bad > sign. Did you see the comment I added to an earlier thread regarding FORTIFY_SOURCE? I think in general my o

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] New sigaltstack backend for coroutine

2012-03-07 Thread Alex Barcelo
Is this patch okay? The first version had some comments, and now the v2 has been a bit too silent, not sure if that's a good sign or a bad sign. Thanks & sorry! On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:25, Alex Barcelo wrote: > This series of patches implements coroutines method with > sigaltstack. > > The fl

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] New sigaltstack backend for coroutine

2012-02-28 Thread Alex Barcelo
This series of patches implements coroutines method with sigaltstack. The flow of creation and management of the coroutines is quite similar to the coroutine-ucontext.c. The way to use sigaltstack to achieve the needed stack manipulation is done in a way quite similar to the GNU Portable Threads (