On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 01:20:08PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 22/07/19 10:39, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 03:32:12PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> >> Hi, this series is rebased on top of the qmp event fix, and takes
> >> Paolo's suggestion to implement ->wakeup for i386
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 01:20:08PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 22/07/19 10:39, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 03:32:12PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> >> Hi, this series is rebased on top of the qmp event fix, and takes
> >> Paolo's suggestion to implement ->wakeup for i386
On 22/07/19 10:39, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 03:32:12PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> Hi, this series is rebased on top of the qmp event fix, and takes
>> Paolo's suggestion to implement ->wakeup for i386 before adding
>> ppc, which makes it much nicer.
>>
>> If the first
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 03:32:12PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Hi, this series is rebased on top of the qmp event fix, and takes
> Paolo's suggestion to implement ->wakeup for i386 before adding
> ppc, which makes it much nicer.
>
> If the first two patches can be agreed on initially and
Hi, this series is rebased on top of the qmp event fix, and takes
Paolo's suggestion to implement ->wakeup for i386 before adding
ppc, which makes it much nicer.
If the first two patches can be agreed on initially and merged, I
can take the third patch through the ppc list after that.
Thanks,
Hi, this series is rebased on top of the qmp event fix, and takes
Paolo's suggestion to implement ->wakeup for i386 before adding
ppc, which makes it much nicer.
If the first two patches can be agreed on initially and merged, I
can take the third patch through the ppc list after that.
Thanks,
