Changes v1 -> v2:
* Fix build without CONFIG_KVM at lmce_supported()
* Rebased on top of my x86-next branch:
https://github.com/ehabkost/qemu x86-next
Git branch for testing:
https://github.com/ehabkost/qemu-hacks work/x86-cpu-max-tcg
libvirt code to use the new feature already exist, and wer
On 24 February 2017 at 18:04, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 24 February 2017 at 17:11, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 01:48:46PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> I had a look at implementing this for ARM, and ran into problems
>>> because of how we've done '-cpu host'. For us the "h
Ping?
As v1 was sitting on the list since Jan 19, if there are no
objections I will merge this and include in my next pull request
before soft freeze.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 03:39:16PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Changes v1 -> v2:
> * Fix build without CONFIG_KVM at lmce_supported()
> * Reba
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 05:07:47PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Ping?
>
> As v1 was sitting on the list since Jan 19, if there are no
> objections I will merge this and include in my next pull request
> before soft freeze.
Do you have a copy which applies on top of current HEAD? I get
loads o
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 09:57:41PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 05:07:47PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > Ping?
> >
> > As v1 was sitting on the list since Jan 19, if there are no
> > objections I will merge this and include in my next pull request
> > before soft
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 09:26:30AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 09:57:41PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 05:07:47PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > Ping?
> > >
> > > As v1 was sitting on the list since Jan 19, if there are no
> > > obje
On 22 February 2017 at 18:39, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Changes v1 -> v2:
> * Fix build without CONFIG_KVM at lmce_supported()
> * Rebased on top of my x86-next branch:
> https://github.com/ehabkost/qemu x86-next
>
> Git branch for testing:
> https://github.com/ehabkost/qemu-hacks work/x86-cpu-
Am 24.02.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 22 February 2017 at 18:39, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>> Changes v1 -> v2:
>> * Fix build without CONFIG_KVM at lmce_supported()
>> * Rebased on top of my x86-next branch:
>> https://github.com/ehabkost/qemu x86-next
>>
>> Git branch for testing:
>>
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 01:48:46PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 22 February 2017 at 18:39, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > Changes v1 -> v2:
> > * Fix build without CONFIG_KVM at lmce_supported()
> > * Rebased on top of my x86-next branch:
> > https://github.com/ehabkost/qemu x86-next
> >
> > Git
On 24 February 2017 at 17:11, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 01:48:46PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> I had a look at implementing this for ARM, and ran into problems
>> because of how we've done '-cpu host'. For us the "host" CPU
>> type is registered dynamically when kvm_init(
10 matches
Mail list logo