On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 04:00:36PM +0100, Vincenzo Maffione wrote:
> 2014/1/16 Stefan Hajnoczi
>
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:59:44AM +0100, Vincenzo Maffione wrote:
> > > (3) There is actually an important problem. In the previous patch
> > version, TCP/UDP traffic was
> > > supported betw
2014/1/16 Stefan Hajnoczi
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:59:44AM +0100, Vincenzo Maffione wrote:
> > (3) There is actually an important problem. In the previous patch
> version, TCP/UDP traffic was
> > supported between two guests attached to a VALE switch if and only
> if both guests use (or
>
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:59:44AM +0100, Vincenzo Maffione wrote:
> (3) There is actually an important problem. In the previous patch version,
> TCP/UDP traffic was
> supported between two guests attached to a VALE switch if and only if
> both guests use (or
> don't) the same offloadings
Vincenzo,
I'm using a tap interface and in the guest virtual device i see all
offloading features are disabled, even though they are enabled in the
physical device.
Perhaps you can help? See below related information:
Bridge to the physical interface in the host:
--
The purpose of this patch series is to add offloadings support
(TSO/UFO/CSUM) to the netmap network backend, and make it possible
for the paravirtual network frontends (virtio-net and vmxnet3) to
use it.
In order to achieve this, these patches extend the existing
net.h interface to add abstract ope
