malc av1...@comtv.ru writes:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
After applying this version 2 of this patch series, I can
successfully run Micoport UNIX System V/386, v 2.1 (ca 1987)
under qemu. (although not if I try to enable KVM)
Version 1 of this series was posted about 4
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Anthony Liguori wrote:
malc av1...@comtv.ru writes:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
After applying this version 2 of this patch series, I can
successfully run Micoport UNIX System V/386, v 2.1 (ca 1987)
under qemu. (although not if I try to enable
malc av1...@comtv.ru writes:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Anthony Liguori wrote:
malc av1...@comtv.ru writes:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
After applying this version 2 of this patch series, I can
successfully run Micoport UNIX System V/386, v 2.1 (ca 1987)
under qemu.
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Anthony Liguori wrote:
malc av1...@comtv.ru writes:
[..snip..]
Number 2 was, and should stay, as the emulation wasn't correct before it,
don't really care about the rest.
Okay, please revert the rest then.
Done.
[..snip..]
--
mailto:av1...@comtv.ru
malc av1...@comtv.ru writes:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Anthony Liguori wrote:
malc av1...@comtv.ru writes:
[..snip..]
Number 2 was, and should stay, as the emulation wasn't correct before it,
don't really care about the rest.
Okay, please revert the rest then.
Done.
Thank you!
On 24 August 2012 06:44, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de wrote:
On 2012-08-24 05:58, malc wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
After applying this version 2 of this patch series, I can
successfully run Micoport UNIX System V/386, v 2.1 (ca 1987)
under qemu. (although not if I try
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-08-24 05:58, malc wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
After applying this version 2 of this patch series, I can
successfully run Micoport UNIX System V/386, v 2.1 (ca 1987)
under qemu. (although not if I try to enable KVM)
On 2012-08-24 14:02, malc wrote:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-08-24 05:58, malc wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
After applying this version 2 of this patch series, I can
successfully run Micoport UNIX System V/386, v 2.1 (ca 1987)
under qemu.
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-08-24 14:02, malc wrote:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-08-24 05:58, malc wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
After applying this version 2 of this patch series, I can
successfully run Micoport UNIX
Il 24/08/2012 09:19, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
Err, does this comply with the -rcX process? Patch 6 alone has been on
the list for less than a day. Only now I was able to comment on it, and
I would prefer to not have it merged that easily.
Adding a new command line option certainly looks
On 24 August 2012 14:39, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 24/08/2012 09:19, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
Err, does this comply with the -rcX process? Patch 6 alone has been on
the list for less than a day. Only now I was able to comment on it, and
I would prefer to not have it
After applying this version 2 of this patch series, I can
successfully run Micoport UNIX System V/386, v 2.1 (ca 1987)
under qemu. (although not if I try to enable KVM)
Version 1 of this series was posted about 4 weeks ago. See
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
After applying this version 2 of this patch series, I can
successfully run Micoport UNIX System V/386, v 2.1 (ca 1987)
under qemu. (although not if I try to enable KVM)
Version 1 of this series was posted about 4 weeks ago. See
On 2012-08-24 05:58, malc wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
After applying this version 2 of this patch series, I can
successfully run Micoport UNIX System V/386, v 2.1 (ca 1987)
under qemu. (although not if I try to enable KVM)
Version 1 of this series was posted about 4
14 matches
Mail list logo
