After applying this version 2 of this patch series, I can
successfully run "Micoport UNIX System V/386, v 2.1" (ca 1987)
under qemu. (although not if I try to enable KVM)
Version 1 of this series was posted about 4 weeks ago. See
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?submitter=156
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
> After applying this version 2 of this patch series, I can
> successfully run "Micoport UNIX System V/386, v 2.1" (ca 1987)
> under qemu. (although not if I try to enable KVM)
>
> Version 1 of this series was posted about 4 weeks ago. See
> http://pa
On 2012-08-24 05:58, malc wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
>
>> After applying this version 2 of this patch series, I can
>> successfully run "Micoport UNIX System V/386, v 2.1" (ca 1987)
>> under qemu. (although not if I try to enable KVM)
>>
>> Version 1 of this series was p
On 24 August 2012 06:44, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-08-24 05:58, malc wrote:
>> On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
>>
>>> After applying this version 2 of this patch series, I can
>>> successfully run "Micoport UNIX System V/386, v 2.1" (ca 1987)
>>> under qemu. (although not if I try t
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-08-24 05:58, malc wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
> >
> >> After applying this version 2 of this patch series, I can
> >> successfully run "Micoport UNIX System V/386, v 2.1" (ca 1987)
> >> under qemu. (although not if I try
On 2012-08-24 14:02, malc wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>> On 2012-08-24 05:58, malc wrote:
>>> On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
>>>
After applying this version 2 of this patch series, I can
successfully run "Micoport UNIX System V/386, v 2.1" (ca 1987)
>>>
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-08-24 14:02, malc wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >
> >> On 2012-08-24 05:58, malc wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
> >>>
> After applying this version 2 of this patch series, I can
> successful
Il 24/08/2012 09:19, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
>> >
>> > Err, does this comply with the -rcX process? Patch 6 alone has been on
>> > the list for less than a day. Only now I was able to comment on it, and
>> > I would prefer to not have it merged that easily.
> Adding a new command line option cert
On 24 August 2012 14:39, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 24/08/2012 09:19, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
>>> > Err, does this comply with the -rcX process? Patch 6 alone has been on
>>> > the list for less than a day. Only now I was able to comment on it, and
>>> > I would prefer to not have it merged that
malc writes:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
>
>> After applying this version 2 of this patch series, I can
>> successfully run "Micoport UNIX System V/386, v 2.1" (ca 1987)
>> under qemu. (although not if I try to enable KVM)
>>
>> Version 1 of this series was posted about 4 week
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> malc writes:
>
> > On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
> >
> >> After applying this version 2 of this patch series, I can
> >> successfully run "Micoport UNIX System V/386, v 2.1" (ca 1987)
> >> under qemu. (although not if I try to enable K
malc writes:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> malc writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
>> >
>> >> After applying this version 2 of this patch series, I can
>> >> successfully run "Micoport UNIX System V/386, v 2.1" (ca 1987)
>> >> under qemu. (although
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> malc writes:
>
[..snip..]
> >
> > Number 2 was, and should stay, as the emulation wasn't correct before it,
> > don't really care about the rest.
>
> Okay, please revert the rest then.
>
Done.
[..snip..]
--
mailto:av1...@comtv.ru
malc writes:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> malc writes:
>>
>
> [..snip..]
>
>> >
>> > Number 2 was, and should stay, as the emulation wasn't correct before it,
>> > don't really care about the rest.
>>
>> Okay, please revert the rest then.
>>
>
> Done.
Thank you!
Regard
14 matches
Mail list logo