On 10/27/2012 06:34 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Evgeny Voevodin wrote:
Today I made more precise testing with usage of --enable-profiler.
Here is the test procedure:
1. Boot Linux Kernel 5 times.
2. For each iteration wait while "JIT cycles" is stable for ~10 seconds
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Evgeny Voevodin wrote:
> Today I made more precise testing with usage of --enable-profiler.
>
> Here is the test procedure:
> 1. Boot Linux Kernel 5 times.
> 2. For each iteration wait while "JIT cycles" is stable for ~10 seconds
> 3. Write down the "cycles/op"
>
>
Today I made more precise testing with usage of --enable-profiler.
Here is the test procedure:
1. Boot Linux Kernel 5 times.
2. For each iteration wait while "JIT cycles" is stable for ~10 seconds
3. Write down the "cycles/op"
Here are the results:
Before clean-up:
min: 731.9
max: 735.8
avg: 73
Here are the results of tests before and after this patch series was
applied:
* EEMBC CoreMark (before -> after)
- Guest: Exynos4210 ARMv7, Linux (Custom buildroot image)
- Host: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 750 @ 2.67GHz, 4GB RAM, Linux
- Results: 1148.105626 -> 1161.440186 (+1.16%)
* nbench
On 10/25/2012 07:17 AM, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 07:06:37AM +0400, Evgeny Voevodin wrote:
Any other comments on the patches?
I didn't get the consensus. Do we need a pointer to tcg context?
As I said before, I didn't notice any slow-down with it.
On 10/23/2012 10:21 AM,
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 07:06:37AM +0400, Evgeny Voevodin wrote:
> Any other comments on the patches?
> I didn't get the consensus. Do we need a pointer to tcg context?
> As I said before, I didn't notice any slow-down with it.
>
> On 10/23/2012 10:21 AM, Evgeny Voevodin wrote:
> > This set of pat
Any other comments on the patches?
I didn't get the consensus. Do we need a pointer to tcg context?
As I said before, I didn't notice any slow-down with it.
On 10/23/2012 10:21 AM, Evgeny Voevodin wrote:
This set of patches moves global variables to tcg_ctx:
gen_opc_ptr
gen_opparam_ptr
gen_opc_b
On 10/23/2012 10:21 AM, Evgeny Voevodin wrote:
This set of patches moves global variables to tcg_ctx:
gen_opc_ptr
gen_opparam_ptr
gen_opc_buf
gen_opparam_buf
Build tested for all targets.
Execution tested on ARM.
I didn't notice any slow-down of kernel boot after this set was applied.
Changelo
This set of patches moves global variables to tcg_ctx:
gen_opc_ptr
gen_opparam_ptr
gen_opc_buf
gen_opparam_buf
Build tested for all targets.
Execution tested on ARM.
I didn't notice any slow-down of kernel boot after this set was applied.
Changelog:
v1->v2:
Introduced TCGContext *tcg_cur_ctx glo
