On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:06:54PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> This is a follow-up to patches 2-6 of:
> [PATCH v2 00/11] blockjobs: Fix transactional race condition
>
> That series started trying to refactor blockjobs with the goal of
> internalizing BlockJob state as a side effect of having gone
This is a follow-up to patches 2-6 of:
[PATCH v2 00/11] blockjobs: Fix transactional race condition
That series started trying to refactor blockjobs with the goal of
internalizing BlockJob state as a side effect of having gone through
the effort of figuring out which commands were "safe" to call
