On 25/05/2017 09:40, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Wed, 05/24 10:32, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>> Ping?
>>
>
> Looks good to me except for the mingw 32bit build failure reported by patchew:
>
> http://patchew.org/QEMU/20170511144208.24075-1-pbonz...@redhat.com/
>
> Do you want to fix it?
Yes, I misread
On Wed, 05/24 10:32, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> Ping?
>
Looks good to me except for the mingw 32bit build failure reported by patchew:
http://patchew.org/QEMU/20170511144208.24075-1-pbonz...@redhat.com/
Do you want to fix it?
Fam
On 11/05/2017 16:41, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> This series uses mutexes or atomic operations around core block layer
> operations. The remaining parts include:
>
> I've removed the failing assertion in bdrv_aligned_pwritev in order to
> test block migration.
>
> Paolo
>
> v1->v2: add missing com
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 04:41:50PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> This series uses mutexes or atomic operations around core block layer
> operations. The remaining parts include:
>
> I've removed the failing assertion in bdrv_aligned_pwritev in order to
> test block migration.
>
> Paolo
>
> v1->
Hi,
This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Message-id: 20170511144208.24075-1-pbonz...@redhat.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/18] Block layer thread safety, part 1
Type: series
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin/bash
BASE=base
n=1
This series uses mutexes or atomic operations around core block layer
operations. The remaining parts include:
I've removed the failing assertion in bdrv_aligned_pwritev in order to
test block migration.
Paolo
v1->v2: add missing comment for 'wakeup' member [Fam]
rewrite throttle-groups
