On 06/09/2018 05:00 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> * Changed the table into a switch, for the reason documented.
> Use macros to actually enter the syscall into the switch.
> * Finish the split.
> * Fix some bugs along the way.
I forgot to mention, this is based on
https://lists.gnu.org/archive
On 06/10/2018 02:34 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> It's still a stupidly large source file -- is it worth taking
> advantage of the split into multiple implementation functions
> to break it up into multiple source files? (We could group
> related syscalls together.)
It's possible. Any suggestions fo
On 10 June 2018 at 04:00, Richard Henderson
wrote:
> * Changed the table into a switch, for the reason documented.
> Use macros to actually enter the syscall into the switch.
> * Finish the split.
> * Fix some bugs along the way.
>
> I know it's a huge patch set, but I guess it was always going
Hi,
This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Type: series
Message-id: 20180610030220.3777-1-richard.hender...@linaro.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 000/108] linux-user: Split do_syscall
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin/bash
BASE=base
n=1
* Changed the table into a switch, for the reason documented.
Use macros to actually enter the syscall into the switch.
* Finish the split.
* Fix some bugs along the way.
I know it's a huge patch set, but I guess it was always going
to be in order to finish -- it was a stupidly large function.
