At the same time, split out set_robust_list and get_robust_list.
Put them together, along with their block comment, at the top
of syscall_table.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
linux-user/syscall.c | 87 +---
1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 21 delet
On 10 June 2018 at 04:00, Richard Henderson
wrote:
> At the same time, split out set_robust_list and get_robust_list.
> Put them together, along with their block comment, at the top
> of syscall_table.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
> ---
> linux-user/syscall.c | 87 +++
On 10 June 2018 at 13:32, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 10 June 2018 at 04:00, Richard Henderson
> wrote:
>> At the same time, split out set_robust_list and get_robust_list.
>> Put them together, along with their block comment, at the top
>> of syscall_table.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
On 06/10/2018 02:39 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> It would be cleaner to have a single
> #if something
> static foo_impl(..) { ... }
> static syscall_impl foo = {
> .name = "foo",
> .impl = foo_impl,
> .strace_stuff = ...,
> };
> register_syscall(foo);
> #endif
>
> Hash table?
It would b
