On 09/07/2016 11:48 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 14:13 +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 09/07/2016 01:08 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 12:50 +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
This is a bit broader than Ben's patch which used
On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 14:13 +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 09/07/2016 01:08 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 12:50 +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > >
> > > This is a bit broader than Ben's patch which used
> > > PPC_SEGMENT_64B.
> > > it's basically
On 09/07/2016 01:08 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 12:50 +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> This is a bit broader than Ben's patch which used PPC_SEGMENT_64B.
>> it's basically !PPC_64B which includes the e5500.
>>
>> If so, here is a proposal below adding a new PPC_RFI
On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 12:50 +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> This is a bit broader than Ben's patch which used PPC_SEGMENT_64B.
> it's basically !PPC_64B which includes the e5500.
>
> If so, here is a proposal below adding a new PPC_RFI in the
> "PowerPC Instructions types definitions" enum for
On 09/06/2016 09:07 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 06/09/16 01:16, David Gibson wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 09:51:09PM +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>>> On 05/09/16 21:30, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>>>
> Shall we disable rfi now for QEMU 2.8 ? Cédric, could you maybe send a
>
On 06/09/16 01:16, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 09:51:09PM +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>> On 05/09/16 21:30, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>>
Shall we disable rfi now for QEMU 2.8 ? Cédric, could you maybe send a
patch with that hunk again?
>>>
>>> Sure. I have kept it in
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 09:51:09PM +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 05/09/16 21:30, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>
> >> Shall we disable rfi now for QEMU 2.8 ? Cédric, could you maybe send a
> >> patch with that hunk again?
> >
> > Sure. I have kept it in a warm place here :
> >
> >
> >
On 05/09/16 21:30, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> Shall we disable rfi now for QEMU 2.8 ? Cédric, could you maybe send a
>> patch with that hunk again?
>
> Sure. I have kept it in a warm place here :
>
>
> https://github.com/legoater/qemu/commit/492a631e4e817863be312c1a34957cd8d679a56c
>
On 09/05/2016 10:25 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 23.06.2016 07:50, David Gibson wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 08:48:14AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>>> On 06/22/2016 04:46 AM, David Gibson wrote:
I'm not comfortable merging this until the openbios change is pulled
back into the
On 23.06.2016 07:50, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 08:48:14AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 06/22/2016 04:46 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>>> I'm not comfortable merging this until the openbios change is pulled
>>> back into the qemu tree (submodule and pre-built binary).
>>>
>>>
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 08:08:38AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 06/23/2016 07:50 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 08:48:14AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >> On 06/22/2016 04:46 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> >>> I'm not comfortable merging this until the openbios change is
On 06/23/2016 07:50 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 08:48:14AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 06/22/2016 04:46 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>>> I'm not comfortable merging this until the openbios change is pulled
>>> back into the qemu tree (submodule and pre-built binary).
>>>
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 08:48:14AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 06/22/2016 04:46 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > I'm not comfortable merging this until the openbios change is pulled
> > back into the qemu tree (submodule and pre-built binary).
> >
> > Again - sure you don't want to apply this
On 06/22/2016 04:46 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> I'm not comfortable merging this until the openbios change is pulled
> back into the qemu tree (submodule and pre-built binary).
>
> Again - sure you don't want to apply this with rfi still enabled for
> 64-bit for now, letting the rest of this series
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:48:46PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
>
> This reworks emulation of the various "rfi" variants. I removed
> some masking bits that I couldn't make sense of, the only bit that
> I am aware we should mask here is
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
This reworks emulation of the various "rfi" variants. I removed
some masking bits that I couldn't make sense of, the only bit that
I am aware we should mask here is POW, the CPU's MSR mask should
take care of the rest.
This also fixes some
16 matches
Mail list logo