Benoît Canet writes:
>> index ff95da6..fa8a7d0 100644
>> --- a/qemu-nbd.c
>> +++ b/qemu-nbd.c
>> @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>> }
>>
>
>> blk = blk_new("hda", &error_abort);
> Is a blk_new_with_bs converssion missing here ?
Yes. Max spotted it, too :)
>> -
> index ff95da6..fa8a7d0 100644
> --- a/qemu-nbd.c
> +++ b/qemu-nbd.c
> @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> }
>
> blk = blk_new("hda", &error_abort);
Is a blk_new_with_bs converssion missing here ?
> -bs = bdrv_new_root("hda", &error_abort);
> +bs = blk_bs(bl
Max Reitz writes:
> On 13.09.2014 17:00, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> The pointer from BlockBackend to BlockDriverState is a strong
>> reference, managed with bdrv_ref() / bdrv_unref(), the back-pointer is
>> a weak one.
>>
>> Convenience function blk_new_with_bs() creates a BlockBackend with its
On 13.09.2014 17:00, Markus Armbruster wrote:
The pointer from BlockBackend to BlockDriverState is a strong
reference, managed with bdrv_ref() / bdrv_unref(), the back-pointer is
a weak one.
Convenience function blk_new_with_bs() creates a BlockBackend with its
BlockDriverState. Callers have to
The pointer from BlockBackend to BlockDriverState is a strong
reference, managed with bdrv_ref() / bdrv_unref(), the back-pointer is
a weak one.
Convenience function blk_new_with_bs() creates a BlockBackend with its
BlockDriverState. Callers have to unref both. The commit after next
will relieve
