index ff95da6..fa8a7d0 100644
--- a/qemu-nbd.c
+++ b/qemu-nbd.c
@@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
}
blk = blk_new(hda, error_abort);
Is a blk_new_with_bs converssion missing here ?
-bs = bdrv_new_root(hda, error_abort);
+bs = blk_bs(blk);
Benoît Canet benoit.ca...@nodalink.com writes:
index ff95da6..fa8a7d0 100644
--- a/qemu-nbd.c
+++ b/qemu-nbd.c
@@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
}
blk = blk_new(hda, error_abort);
Is a blk_new_with_bs converssion missing here ?
Yes. Max spotted it, too :)
The pointer from BlockBackend to BlockDriverState is a strong
reference, managed with bdrv_ref() / bdrv_unref(), the back-pointer is
a weak one.
Convenience function blk_new_with_bs() creates a BlockBackend with its
BlockDriverState. Callers have to unref both. The commit after next
will
On 13.09.2014 17:00, Markus Armbruster wrote:
The pointer from BlockBackend to BlockDriverState is a strong
reference, managed with bdrv_ref() / bdrv_unref(), the back-pointer is
a weak one.
Convenience function blk_new_with_bs() creates a BlockBackend with its
BlockDriverState. Callers have
