* Michael R. Hines (mrhi...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> On 06/11/2015 12:17 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> >From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
> >
> >In the next patch we remove the hash on the destination,
> >rdma_delete_block does two things with the hash which can be avoided:
> > a) T
On 06/11/2015 12:17 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
In the next patch we remove the hash on the destination,
rdma_delete_block does two things with the hash which can be avoided:
a) The caller passes the offset and rdma_delete_block looks it up
in
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
In the next patch we remove the hash on the destination,
rdma_delete_block does two things with the hash which can be avoided:
a) The caller passes the offset and rdma_delete_block looks it up
in the hash; fixed by getting the caller to pass the block
b) Th
