Marc-André Lureau writes:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 6:10 PM Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
>> Marc-André Lureau writes:
>>
>> > Suggested by Markus Armbruster:
>> >
>> > We should systematically cover the integers, in particular the
>> > boundaries (because that's where bugs like to hide):
>>
Hi
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 6:10 PM Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Marc-André Lureau writes:
>
> > Suggested by Markus Armbruster:
> >
> > We should systematically cover the integers, in particular the
> > boundaries (because that's where bugs like to hide):
> >
> > * Integers in [-2^63,0) can be vis
Marc-André Lureau writes:
> Suggested by Markus Armbruster:
>
> We should systematically cover the integers, in particular the
> boundaries (because that's where bugs like to hide):
>
> * Integers in [-2^63,0) can be visited with visit_type_int() and
> visit_type_number().
>
> * Integers in [0,
Suggested by Markus Armbruster:
We should systematically cover the integers, in particular the
boundaries (because that's where bugs like to hide):
* Integers in [-2^63,0) can be visited with visit_type_int() and
visit_type_number().
* Integers in [0,2^63) can be visited with visit_type_int(),
