Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] qxl: send interrupt after migration in case ram->int_pending != 0, RHBZ #732949

2011-09-03 Thread Yonit Halperin
On 09/01/2011 10:36 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 03:37:33PM +0300, Yonit Halperin wrote: if qxl_send_events was called from spice server context, and then migration had completed before a call to pipe_read, the target guest qxl driver didn't get the interrupt. This is

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] qxl: send interrupt after migration in case ram->int_pending != 0, RHBZ #732949

2011-09-01 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 03:37:33PM +0300, Yonit Halperin wrote: > if qxl_send_events was called from spice server context, and then > migration had completed before a call to pipe_read, the target > guest qxl driver didn't get the interrupt. This is a general issue with interrupt migration, and PC

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] qxl: send interrupt after migration in case ram->int_pending != 0, RHBZ #732949

2011-08-31 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On 08/31/11 14:37, Yonit Halperin wrote: if qxl_send_events was called from spice server context, and then migration had completed before a call to pipe_read, the target guest qxl driver didn't get the interrupt. In addition, qxl_send_events ignored further interrupts of the same kind, since ram-

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] qxl: send interrupt after migration in case ram->int_pending != 0, RHBZ #732949

2011-08-31 Thread Yonit Halperin
if qxl_send_events was called from spice server context, and then migration had completed before a call to pipe_read, the target guest qxl driver didn't get the interrupt. In addition, qxl_send_events ignored further interrupts of the same kind, since ram->int_pending was set. As a result, the gues