Richard Henderson writes:
> On 11/8/18 5:33 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> -.bvr = addr
>> +.bvr = sextract64(addr, 52, 53)
>
> I think you meant sextract64(addr, 0, 53).
> What you wrote *should* have asserted, since 52+53 > 64.
Dam, I did fix that. I must have failed to propagate
On 11/8/18 5:33 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
> -.bvr = addr
> +.bvr = sextract64(addr, 52, 53)
I think you meant sextract64(addr, 0, 53).
What you wrote *should* have asserted, since 52+53 > 64.
r~
This only fails with some (broken) versions of gdb but we should
treat the top bits of DBGBVR as RESS. Properly sign extend QEMU's
reference copy of dbgbvr and also update the register descriptions in
the comment.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
---
v2
- sanitise register on insertion
- update re
