On 03/03/2016 06:08 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake writes:
>
>> Now that the generator supports it, we might as well use an
>> anonymous base rather than breaking out a single-use CpuInfoBase
>> structure.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
>
> Again, introspection value remains the sam
Eric Blake writes:
> Now that the generator supports it, we might as well use an
> anonymous base rather than breaking out a single-use CpuInfoBase
> structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
Again, introspection value remains the same.
Patch looks good.
Should we eliminate more base types?
Now that the generator supports it, we might as well use an
anonymous base rather than breaking out a single-use CpuInfoBase
structure.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
---
v2: no change
v1: no change
Previously posted as part of qapi cleanup subset F:
v6: new patch
---
scripts/qapi.py | 2 +-
qapi-
