On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 21:37 +0800, Cao jin wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On 09/23/2015 01:51 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 18:08 +0800, Cao jin wrote:
> >> Hi Alex
> >>
> >> On 09/22/2015 02:00 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Please use different subjects that uniquely identi
Hi Alex,
On 09/23/2015 01:51 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 18:08 +0800, Cao jin wrote:
Hi Alex
On 09/22/2015 02:00 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
Please use different subjects that uniquely identify what each patch
does, don't simply re-use the subject for the cover patch on e
On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 18:08 +0800, Cao jin wrote:
> Hi Alex
>
> On 09/22/2015 02:00 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >
> > Please use different subjects that uniquely identify what each patch
> > does, don't simply re-use the subject for the cover patch on each.
>
> OK, will change it in next version
Hi Alex
On 09/22/2015 02:00 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
Please use different subjects that uniquely identify what each patch
does, don't simply re-use the subject for the cover patch on each.
OK, will change it in next version.
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 10:02 +0800, Cao jin wrote:
In case user
Please use different subjects that uniquely identify what each patch
does, don't simply re-use the subject for the cover patch on each.
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 10:02 +0800, Cao jin wrote:
> In case user regret when hot-add multi-function, we should roll back,
> device_del the function added but st
In case user regret when hot-add multi-function, we should roll back,
device_del the function added but still not worked.
Signed-off-by: Cao jin
---
hw/pci/pcie.c | 18 ++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie.c b/hw/pci/pcie.c
index 89bf61b..497f390 100644
-
