On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 02:09:18PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
If the expected (offline) acpi tables loaded correctly,
it is safe to assume the iasl installation is OK and
issue an error if the actual tables differ from expected
ones.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum marce...@redhat.com
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 17:25 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 02:09:18PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
If the expected (offline) acpi tables loaded correctly,
it is safe to assume the iasl installation is OK and
issue an error if the actual tables differ from
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 17:52 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 05:39:39PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 17:25 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 02:09:18PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
If the expected (offline) acpi
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 05:39:39PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 17:25 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 02:09:18PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
If the expected (offline) acpi tables loaded correctly,
it is safe to assume the iasl
If the expected (offline) acpi tables loaded correctly,
it is safe to assume the iasl installation is OK and
issue an error if the actual tables differ from expected
ones.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum marce...@redhat.com
---
tests/acpi-test.c | 24
1 file changed, 16
