On 2/6/19 12:26 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> shows a lot of, exactly 34 after io.c already updated.
>>> They are in different subsystems, so I think it should be simpler to push
>>> this
>>> one as a precedent and example, and then send separate patches (or series)
>>>
06.02.2019 21:14, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 2/6/19 12:09 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> 06.02.2019 20:32, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> On 2/6/19 10:53 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Use new qemu_iovec_init_buf() instead of
qemu_iovec_init_external( ... , 1), which simplifies
On 2/6/19 12:09 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 06.02.2019 20:32, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 2/6/19 10:53 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> Use new qemu_iovec_init_buf() instead of
>>> qemu_iovec_init_external( ... , 1), which simplifies the code.
>>
>> Did you just do a manual
06.02.2019 20:32, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 2/6/19 10:53 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> Use new qemu_iovec_init_buf() instead of
>> qemu_iovec_init_external( ... , 1), which simplifies the code.
>
> Did you just do a manual search for candidate callers?
>
> As you said in the cover
On 2/6/19 10:53 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Use new qemu_iovec_init_buf() instead of
> qemu_iovec_init_external( ... , 1), which simplifies the code.
Did you just do a manual search for candidate callers?
As you said in the cover letter, there are other files that can benefit
as
Use new qemu_iovec_init_buf() instead of
qemu_iovec_init_external( ... , 1), which simplifies the code.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
---
block/io.c | 90 +-
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
diff --git
