On 2017-05-25 08:34, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Wed, 05/24 15:28, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Not all callers care about which BDS owns the mapping for a given
>> range of the file. This patch merely simplifies the callers by
>> consolidating the logic in the common call point, while guaranteeing
>> a
On 05/25/2017 01:34 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Wed, 05/24 15:28, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Not all callers care about which BDS owns the mapping for a given
>> range of the file. This patch merely simplifies the callers by
>> consolidating the logic in the common call point, while guaranteeing
>> a
On Wed, 05/24 15:28, Eric Blake wrote:
> Not all callers care about which BDS owns the mapping for a given
> range of the file. This patch merely simplifies the callers by
> consolidating the logic in the common call point, while guaranteeing
> a non-NULL file to all the driver callbacks, for no
Not all callers care about which BDS owns the mapping for a given
range of the file. This patch merely simplifies the callers by
consolidating the logic in the common call point, while guaranteeing
a non-NULL file to all the driver callbacks, for no semantic change.
However, this will also set
